Not necessarily. The current system of recording vaccine injury is a passive system that requires the injured party to know about it and be able to file a report. This means that many adverse events go unreported. A Harvard study conducted between 2007 and 2010 found that fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries are actually reported to VAERS. Most who are injured are not made aware of VAERS and most clinicians don’t have the time to file a report. The vaccine-injured or responsible parties of the vaccine injured often lack the time or the know-how to file a report themselves. The average person doesn’t know the necessary medical terminology or coding. So, the true number of injuries could be 100x greater than what we’re seeing reported.

In 1986, The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was enacted into law. This law frees manufacturers from any liability for any vaccine on the CDC recommended childhood schedule. Congress enacted this law and program because lawsuits against companies that manufacture vaccines as well as healthcare providers threatened the vaccine program in terms of vaccine shortages and decreased or reduced vaccination rates. Within this law the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was created. Since those harmed by vaccines can no longer sue the manufacturer, the government now has a “vaccine court” that determines whether a submission is a vaccine injury worthy of compensation. The funding for compensation to those harmed by vaccines originates from a tax of $0.75 per vaccine per disease. A vaccine for one illness has a tax of $0.75, whereas a vaccine that targets more than one illness like MMR, for example, would have a tax of $2.25. Individuals who are injured or who have lost loved ones to vaccines are faced with the arduous task of going against the federal government in order to obtain compensation. The following links are the 1986 law as many commonly refer to it and Health Resources & Services Administration analysis of the 1986 law. The film, “1986: The Act,” produced by Andrew Wakefield explores this topic in the form of a feature film.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546

https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/about

The testing for vaccines is not nearly as rigorous as the public has been led to believe. Unfortunately, many vaccines given to infants are only tested for days to months before licensure. It also turns out that most vaccines are NOT tested against a true saline placebo, but are tested against other vaccines, which are treated as the “placebo.” The book “Turtles All the Way Down” is a reference for how each vaccine was tested and what was used as a “placebo.” Aaron Siri also addresses this issue in a presentation before the Arizona State Senate in 2023.

The public has the idea that vaccine produce life-long or at least long-term immunity. This idea is the result of the fact that the first vaccines, such as those against measles, were live viral vaccines that provided long-term immunity. However, most vaccines on the market are not live viral vaccines and are not able to generate the long-term immunity that they produce. Inactivated and subunit vaccines only provide short-term immunity that wanes quickly. Further, these types of vaccines only engage part of the immune response in such a way that they can mis-train the immune system so that in the future it only responds to the variant of the pathogen that the vaccine was made to. Thus, the immune system fails to respond properly to new variants. Researcher, Peter Aaby, has done a lot of work exploring this issue.

From “Dissolving Illusions” (p.92) “the death rate for smallpox declined after 1872, but there is no evidence that vaccination had anything at all to do with it. In the early 1900s, death from smallpox all but vanished from England (Graph 4.5). Interestingly, the pattern of smallpox deaths mirrored almost perfectly a much bigger picture—scarlet fever, a bacterial toxin-mediated disease. There was a scarlet fever toxin vaccine, which was never widely used because it had severe consequences to many of its recipients. A marked decline in scarlet fever death occurred long before any antibiotic was used.

Some may look at the graphs and think that the vaccine just needed longer to have its effect. But after 1972, vaccination coverage rates slowly declined from a high of nearly 90 percent. Coverage rates plummeted to only 40 percent by 1909 (Graph 4.6). Despite declining vaccination rates, smallpox deaths remained low, vanishing to near zero after 1906. Smallpox vaccination has always correlated positively to epidemics in the countries that collected data in the vain hope of proving the vaccine’s worth.”

As far as Polio, it turns out that again, vaccination for Polio was correlated with higher rates of disease. Secondarily, high paralytic Polio incidence was also strongly correlated with high pesticide usage. It’s possible that pesticides compromised gut health causing children to be susceptible to the Polio virus (as well as other enteroviruses, such as Echo and Coxsackie viruses). Both of these stories are told in “Dissolving Illusions” by Suzanne Humphries. The book “The Moth in the Iron Lung” by Forrest Maready also presents the history of Polio in the United States.

The media tends to portray the illnesses that are now considered “vaccine-preventable” as if they were a plaque with extremely high mortality. The truth is that the incidence of these illnesses was largely due to factors such as mass malnutrition, living in close quarters and poor sanitation. Once these issues were addressed in the modern era, the incidence of both vaccine-preventable illnesses as well as those that never had a vaccine for them was reduced dramatically. Generally, after the onset improved sanitation, the incidence of these type of illnesses fell to between 1 and 40 persons for every 100,000 persons. Suzanne Humphries’ book, “Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History” covers this topic in detail.

The CDC would like you to think so. But, if you look beyond the surface, the 2015 study that the CDC uses to assert this claim narrowly looked at the MMR (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella) and neglected to look at any other vaccine as a potential aggressor for the sudden onset of ASD symptoms following routine “well-child” visits. The MMR was only compared with other vaccines, not an inert placebo (a harmless substance like a saline injection). There is a multitude of families that claim their child developed ASD after the DTaP (Diphtheria, Tetanus, and acellular pertussis) shot. Of course, this is anecdotal, and, since the CDC wants you to believe the “case is closed”, we will likely not see this study attempted again with a true placebo control or by investigating any other vaccine. Rather than suspecting one particular vaccine, we should look at all vaccines, as there is insurmountable evidence that the autoimmune response post-vaccination is causing encephalitis, which can cause autism. There are several other factors to be considered, as well, like acetaminophen use in pregnancy and early infancy, folic acid in prenatal vitamins (synthetic vitamin b9) which actually blocks folate receptors and causes folate deficiency, glyphosate laden foods causing gut dysbiosis, and an overall lack of understanding in regards to prenatal nutrition. What we can infer from testimonies of families affected by ASD, vaccines were the “straw that broke the camel’s back” with environmental factors considered.

The idea that the COVID vaccines saved millions of lies is based on conjecture, not data. Recent data on all-cause mortality now shows that vaccination increased all-cause mortality for about a week immediately after vaccination, then all-cause mortality did decrease for a small window of a few months after vaccination following which time it went back up. Taken together, it now appears that increases in vaccine-related all-cause mortality exceeds any benefit of vaccination.

In fact, scientists and researchers have been studying coronaviruses and how to deal with respiratory illnesses for many decades. The SARS outbreak in the early 2000s was very carefully studied and led to data showing that chloroquine (and hydroxychloroquine) were effective treatments. Experts from many fields have testified that the government went AGAINST well established standards and protocols for preventing transmissions of pathogens.

In fact, they did NOT do better than the unvaccinated. A recent study from the Cleveland Clinic showed that a person’s risk for contracting COVID increased with every dose of vaccine they received.

Only a tiny amount of aluminum is absorbed by the gut, while ALL of the aluminum that is injected remains in the body. “Aluminium is absorbed in a proportion of 0.1-0.3% by the gastrointestinal tract, and occurs in the upper intestine where absorption is higher due to lower pH levels.”

Further, it isn’t so much the amount of aluminum that matters as much as the route of entry into our bodies. Aluminum that is ingested through the use of aluminum cans and cookware is mostly taken care of by the digestive system and filtered through the liver and kidneys. It is still something to be conscious of with our diets and the tools we use to cook our food, though. The problem with aluminum entering our bodies via intramuscular injection (vaccines) is that it doesn’t go through the filtration processes of the digestive system and our macrophages carry the aluminum particles to the brain with the help of polysorbate-80, which allows the aluminum particles to breach the blood-brain barrier and accumulate in the brain. Over time, that causes aluminum neuro toxicity and possible long-term inflammation of the brain. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318414/